Introducing Deep Softworks
Announcements
Are we interfacing with AI the right way? Naturally, Large
Language Models as next token predictors find their most intuitive
place in a linear chat between human and machine. Upon the public
release of ChatGPT three years ago, the chat interface quickly
cemented itself as the default way we “talk” to AI.
This remains the default choice for developers to this day because
it is in fact a familiar, accessible paradigm. Many wildly
successful "chat bot" products have been built since,
and billions of dollars have followed. In that sense, the chat
interface worked.
However, history has taught us novel tech is seldom afforded its
final form at the outset. Early interfaces tend to mirror what we
already know rather than what the technology ultimately enables.
In the early days of the iPhone app, desktop metaphors were simply
ported over to iOS before morphing into a form that was fit for
the mobile device. I argue the same is true for AI. This is
because the current chat paradigm asks the user to take an
additional step, namely, to write a prompt. This act requires
allocation of cognitive resources, away from writing, deciding,
organizing, referencing, thinking. The antithesis of the
utilitarian promise of AI.
This idea of cognitive siphoning gave rise to the goal of Deep
Softworks: build software as infrastructure for thought. Connect
human and artificial intelligence seamlessly and without friction.
What is the final, invisible, ubiquitous form of AI in software?
How does the lay man interface with it? When these questions are
answered well, the interface becomes lighter. AI fades into the
background. Thought takes center stage.
See how this philosophy is applied in
Rawa, our AI autocomplete for writing, and continue with
Why Invisible AI is Up Next.